We Need Censorship :: Argumentative Persuasive Topics

We Need Censorship     It wont kill us to make limits, but it top executive if we dont. That is why it is JUSTIFIABLE to limit adults granting immunity of expression--it is in our, societys, best interests to nurture the children. Lional Tate is just one example of a child gone problematic because of the media. Tate mimicked his idol the Rock, killing a six-year old girl by shattering her skull, pulverizing her liver, breaking her ribs and causing numerous cuts and bruises. If thats not enough of an example what roughly the teen from New Jersey who simply listened to Ozzy Osbornes Suicide Solution and killed himself? These atomic number 18 not random occurrences, we hear about them on the news frequently. If our freedom of expression is harming kids why cant we fix the problem by not allowing them memory access to it?   Argument one, People, especially children are very susceptible to being influenced by what they watch or see happen throughout their l ives.   tinker see, Monkey do. Everyone has heard this phrase sometime in his or her life. This phrase is simple, further very applicable to todays debate. When a child sees someone or something doing something. They leave of course follow suit and imitate the action being performed. Children do not know any better. Therefore they are innocent and deserve to be respected. It is for these following reasons that we argue for the censorship of harmful materials that could influence a child or children into violent acts, expressions, and other dangerous actions. Through boob tube, mental picture games, and movies, children and teens view countless acts of violence, brutality, and terror as part of entertainment. They become conditioned to associating violence with entertainment. First-person shooter video games develop our childrens skills in operating weapons. The games pay off marksmanship, and further reinforce the association of killing with entertainment. In the past, the heroes of movie and television shows were usually people who strictly followed the law. Now, heroes are often people who fool away the law into their own hands, who see an injustice or evil and adjudicate to rectify it personally, sometimes brutally, regardless of the consequences. Such portrayals signal, to a child, societys approval of that behavior.