Movie and Personality Theory Analysis Essay

The movie Joy fate cabaret visualized opposite characters of women from China who underwent difficulties in their lives. One woman had to bare the pass up of her family for being a concubine, an almost other(a) woman had to leave behind her match under a tree during World War II beca design of an disease and later when she died, her daughter met her older twin sisters, these women were made to think that Chinese women should be meek and gentle, on that pointfore, expecting their Ameri basin born daughters to be the akin. The daughters would retaliate virtu completelyy these expectations from their mothers.They redeem asserted their profess identities and stood up for what they wanted for themselves (Wang, 1989). Eric Eriksons distributor points of psychosocial victimisation coffin nail be aptly applied to the Joy Luck Clubs heroines. They were able to recover themselves and assert their individualities in the end. Eriksons psychosocial stage theory states that ego identity is the conscious sense of self that we check through interaction with our environment and that our personality constantly changes as we go through our daily activities.We are overt to new experiences that contribute to the developing of our personalities. Each stage, according to Erikson, is concerned about competency in a particular area in life that if handled well, the individual depart let a sense of expertise, which he termed as ego strength (Funder, 2010). I quotation from Erikson, Ego identity, then, in its subjective aspect, is the awareness of the fact that in that respect is a self-sameness and continuity to the egos synthesizing methods and a continuity of matchlesss meaning for others (Funder, 2010).If this is managed poorly, the individual will feel inadequate. We experience impinge that becomes a turning point in development which is for his view, these are focussed on either developing or failing that quality. During this stage of interlocking, the re is potential for growth but as well for failure. For B. F. Skinner, operant teach or instrumental conditioning is to associate behavior with a consequence issue or penalisation. In the movie, these theories of Skinner and Erikson were depicted by the mothers who give punishment or reward for certain behaviors manifested by their daughters.They were formed according to the nuances they were exposed to Chinese traditions upheld by their mothers and the American culture they grew up in. Here conditioning came by elan of cultural constraints. This explains the difficulties that the women underwent because they were also a product of their own culture. In the end, they were able to transcend cultural barriers and brace developed their own personalities independent of their mothers. One can say that these girls have bloomed and acquired personalities after stages of conflict that resulted from a culture imbibed by their mothers and a culture they had to embrace.Another nigh theo rist is Carl Rogers who is best known for a non-directive approach in the alterative process. He espouses Humanism in psychology, that believes that all large number are fundamentally right(a) and healthy. According to him, In my early professional years, I was request the question How can I treat, or cure, or change this person? Now I would phrase the question in this way How can I provide a relationship which this person may use for his own personal growth? All the women in the movie were all good, the woman who was judged by her family because of being a concubine, is essentially good.The mother who go away her twins under a tree is essentially good. Often, we misjudge throng for certain behaviors we think are improper or inappropriate. But if we bear witness the circumstances and we know all of the circumstances, we may be careful in judging other peoples behavior. Personally I have learned in my own life that there is such a things as hope and grace. No egress what happ ens to you, life has a way of resolving things and healing emotional and psychological pains so that one can eventually move on celebrating life.In many ways, the culture of my family and familiarity formed me through negative and positive reinforcements. At primary I was afraid to assert myself and I would always conform to what society wants. Eriksons psychosocial development made me realize the challenges that I have to outmatch through lifes challenges and passages. My own realization is that even if I had failed an earlier stage, lifes lessons always come back so that eventually I would know the truth and move on to a higher level.Carl Rogers assumption that man is basically good is refreshing as this has become a steady source of inspiration that no matter what I did or failed to do, I am basically a good person and that I will triumph in the end. I quote from Funder, Every man is in certain respects (a) like all other men, (b) like some other men, (c) like no other man. F under has indicated that everyone is like everyone else, or similar with some, or similar with nobody. He is expression that all men and women are the same in their basic needs for food and shelter.We are all similar in our interests and other things in common, but we are also not similar any other men/women because of the traits that each of us possess, which is what we call personality. Our minds may be the same with other minds and are also unlike any other mind. The set-up of our brains have similar structures but our brains can also be similar some other brains in terms of some disorders, for example. Individuals who are depressed will have neurotransmitter concentrations that are different from those of non-depressed people. We have different abilities academically or athletically, and these activities are controlled by the brain.But abilities are different from everyone. He has verbalize that, Constructivism is widespread throughout modern intellectual life. This attitude , slightly simplified is that globe as a concrete entity does not exist. All that does exist is military personnel ideas or giveions of reality. He has also stated, To some degree, the judgments of personality rendered of you by the people who know you not only reflect what you are like, but can lead you to be what you are like. We have different mental construct of impressions of what we see around us.The concept of beautiful may be different from someone else. Our realities like our view of the world are not a reality. These are interpretations of what we see around us that make sense inwardly our observations of our surroundings and of impressions by people about us. The reality of our personality was also created by the ones who know us which we sometimes affirm. But this is not necessarily the truth of our real personality. Works Cited Funder, D. C. (2010). The Personality Puzzle. New York W. W. Norton & Company. Wang, W. (Director). (1989). Joy Luck Club Motion Picture.